

Interestingly, Reilly's general contention appears supported by empirical data. For instance, in November 2004, the journal Pediatrics published a study finding that BB guns annually injure as many as 21,000 Americans, many of them children. The study also found that while many, if not most, Americans regard BB guns as sporting goods or sporting toys, there is a disconnect between that belief and the remarkable danger they pose. Similarly, it also identified a correlation between the increasing popularity of paintball war games and an increase in serious eye injuries, even among those who use eye-protective devices.

So here's my question: Are "gun sports" for kids matters of public concern, or do they simply reflect kids being kids? Before you answer, just remember what Ralphie Parker was told when he wanted a BB gun for Christmas in A Christmas Story: "You'll shoot your eye out!" Of course, Ralphie couldn't buy the gun himself--he needed Santa to do that. And therein lies the real-world problem: kids on their own buying "toy guns" that aren't really toys because they can shoot and seriously hurt other people seems like a recipe for disaster. Granted, a $5,000 fine doesn't seem all that consequential, and I'm surprised the Massachusetts legislature has set the fine so low in this Post-Columbine era, but holding sporting good stores and other merchants of these "toy" guns liable sounds like a better policy than doing nothing.